![]() ![]() It's a monster brought here through the conjunction, murdering on the countryside. It's not as if this is some silverback, that requires a purposeful encounter trekking to the top of some uninhabited mountain peak. It's a monster that indiscriminately kills men, women, children, anyone that ventures into it's claimed domain. It's subjective, and honestly you can play him however you desire, but the, "90%" that you referenced are lawfully nuteral meaning it absolutely has to die. Attempting to interject a moral code to justify the beasts salvation shows you have a distorted perception as to the content of his character. It's inconsequental as to whether or not it's the last surviving specimen considering it's none terrestrial. Old thread but I'm on a new playthrough over the holidays. The man killing monster is dead in my game. I understand that it eventually dies of natural causes I believe. There are two dead corpses just upon geralt arrival who knows how many prior or after if I had left it. Geralt I think wouldve hated it but given only the option to leave it or kill it would choose the latter. I put humanity before the beast/monster something I think many in today's time doesn't do. And whose to say it will only do so when threatened hunger may kick in you can't reason with a non sentient being. It has tasted human blood will eat and attack. Though merchant's may be aware they are willing to risk peasant workers as is the man who cares for the beast more than he cares for people apparently. Merchsnts aren't likely the only ones that take that route. I weighed that the beasts doesn't indeed attack humans. Had I been given the choice to capture and relate to a fully enclosed or closed off area. Geralt I honestly cant say if he would or would not have killed the beasts as a witcher he is sworn to both protect humanity from non sentient beasts but also protect percieved monsters if one they are sentient or 2 its the last of the species. I tried to act from both Geralt and my own choices both. Now a days we have means of capturing such beasts and placing them in areas so their species survives doesn't interrupt the ecosystem. Imagine a shark, bear, gator even if its the last. What do you do you guys think is the best option? the merchant does his best to keep people away from the beast's territory and compensates for the damage that the beast creates.Geralt has spared many monsters in the past.the beast only attacks when it feels a threat.it is the last surviving silver basilisk and killing it would make them extinct.it is a trade route so definitely more merchants will pass through the area.you find a bandit's note which says that they kill someone and people think the basilisk does the killing.You might think that killing the basilisk is the good option It is one of the many quests in the Witcher 3 where your choice is not simply good or bad, but it depends on what you think is the best. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |